a

Facebook

Twitter

Copyright 2020 taxesproblems.
All Rights Reserved.

TAX SERVICES

SOLVE TAX PROBLEMS

Search

888-786-9829

Text at 220-201-9381

Facebook

Twitter

Menu
 

Meals and Entertainment Deduction

High moral and ethics standards.
Tax Services Solve Tax Problems. > Penalties  > Meals and Entertainment Deduction

Meals and Entertainment Deduction

city

Meals and Entertainment are surprisingly under-explained.

Let’s start with the basics:

  1. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/274 explains the basics of what can be deducted
  2. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/02/26/2020-03723/meals-and-entertainment-expenses-under-section-274  explains in details
  3. https://www.ustaxcourt.gov/UstcInOp2/OpinionViewer.aspx?ID=11982  Court Case
  4. Fitch v Commr. Court Case

The IRC explains the basics:

Business meals

In general, No deduction shall be allowed under this chapter for the expense of any food or beverages unless

  1. such expense is not lavish or extravagant under the circumstances. The taxpayer (or an employee of the taxpayer) is present at the furnishing of such food or beverages. A business owner can not furnish such meals to yourself alone.

Now, let’s review in details what the Federal Register says about Meals and Entertainment expenses:

Travel Meals:

  1. substantiation is required for travel expenses, including food and beverage expenses incurred while on business travel away from home.
  2.  Generally disallows a deduction for expenses for travel as a form of education.  No deduction is allowed under chapter 1 of the Code for travel expenses paid or incurred concerning a spouse, dependent, or other individual accompanying the taxpayer (or an officer or employee of the taxpayer) on business travel, unless the spouse, dependent, or other individual is an employee of the taxpayer. (Reference: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/02/26/2020-03723/meals-and-entertainment-expenses-under-section-274
  3. 50% Deduction

Employer-Provided Meals:

expenses for food or beverages are subject to the 50 percent limitation unless one of the six exceptions to section 274(n) in section 274(e) applies.

Section 274(e) Exceptions to Section 274(k) and (n)

The taxpayer sells goods or services in a bona fide transaction for adequate and full consideration of money or money’s worth. Section 274(e)(9) applies to expenses for goods, services, and facilities to the extent that the expenses are treated as income to a person other than an employee. (Reference https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/02/26/2020-03723/meals-and-entertainment-expenses-under-section-274)

Examples Copied Directly From the Federal Register:

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/02/26/2020-03723/meals-and-entertainment-expenses-under-section-274

(1) Example 1. Taxpayer A invites B, a business associate, to a baseball game to discuss a proposed business deal. Purchase tickets for A and B to attend the game. The baseball game is entertainment as defined in paragraph (b)(1) of this section. Thus, the cost of the game tickets is an entertainment expenditure and is not deductible by A.

(2) Example 2. Assume the same facts as in paragraph (d)(1) of this section (Example 1), except that A also buys hot dogs and drinks for A and B from a concession stand. The hot dogs and drinks cost, which are purchased separately from the game tickets, is not an entertainment expenditure and is not subject to section 274(a)(1) disallowance. Therefore, A may deduct 50 percent of the expenses associated with the hot dogs and drinks purchased at the game if they meet the requirements of section 162 and § 1.274-12.

(3) Example 3. Taxpayer C invites D, a business associate, to a basketball game. C purchases tickets for C and D to attend the game in a suite, where they can access food and beverages. As stated on the invoice, the cost of the basketball game tickets includes food or beverages. The basketball game is entertainment as defined in paragraph (b)(1) of this section. Thus, the cost of the game tickets is an entertainment expenditure and is not deductible by C. The cost of the food and beverages, which are not purchased separately from the game tickets, is not stated separately on the invoice. Thus, the food and beverages cost is an entertainment expenditure that is subject to section 274(a)(1) disallowance. Therefore, C may not deduct the tickets’ cost or the food and beverages associated with the basketball game.

(4) Example 4. Assume the same facts as in paragraph (d)(3) of this section (Example 3), except that the invoice for the basketball game tickets separately states the cost of the food and beverages and reflects the venue’s usual selling price if purchased separately. As in paragraph (d)(3) (Example 3), the basketball game is entertainment as defined in paragraph (b)(1) of this section and. Thus, the cost of the game tickets, other than the cost of the food and beverages, is an entertainment expenditure and is not deductible by C. However, the cost of the food and beverages, which is stated separately on the invoice for the game tickets, is not an entertainment expenditure and is not subject to the section 274(a)(1) disallowance. Therefore, C may deduct 50 percent of the expenses associated with the food and beverages provided at the game if they meet the requirements of section 162 and § 1.274-12.

Court Case where the IRS Disallowed Meals and Entertainment (and other deductions)

https://www.ustaxcourt.gov/UstcInOp2/OpinionViewer.aspx?ID=11982

The IRS disallowed deductions:

  1. tax preparation fees and $40,741 of the deduction for unreimbursed employee expenses.
  2. The disallowed employee business expenses comprise $20,334 of vehicle expenses (which petitioners determined using a standard mileage rate);
  3. $75 of parking fees, tolls, and local transportation expenses;
  4. $10,897 of travel expenses, including lodging, airfares, car rentals,
  5. $5,444 of miscellaneous business expenses, not including meals and entertainment;
  6. $2,904 of meals and entertainment expenses ($1,452 after the 50% limitation);
  7. $480 of union and professional association dues;
  8. $1,440 for a “crash pad”; and
  9. $619 for “special shoes.”

DONALD BURDEN AND MARY TORRES, Petitioners v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Court Case Analysis:

https://www.ustaxcourt.gov/UstcInOp2/OpinionViewer.aspx?ID=11982

A. Vehicle Expenses

to prove by adequate records or evidence sufficient to corroborate the taxpayer’s own testimony:
(1) the amount of the expenditure or use,
(2) the time and place of the business use,
and (3) the business purpose.

The IRS disallowed a deduction for vehicle expenses of $20,334.

B. Transportation Expenses

Petitioners have failed to introduce any testimony, records, or other evidence showing payment of the claimed transportation expenses; they have failed to carry their burden of proving that such expenses were incurred or were incurred for a business purpose.

The IRS disallowed petitioners a deduction for transportation expenses of $75.

C. Traveling Expenses

Petitioners did not break the amount down, nor did they offer any bills, receipts, or other records to substantiate Pastor Burden’s domestic traveling expenses. Moreover,
they apparently did not claim a deduction for all of Pastor Burden’s traveling expenses, alleging: “Days away from home on ministerial duties 100 days @ $180 per day using conservative high low method = $18,000. Petitioners’ unsupported claim for some indeterminate amount of domestic traveling expense does not constitute the substantiation contemplated by section 274(d).  Besides, they did not provide a copy of AWC’s reimbursable
travel plan. They did not show that if Pastor Burden’s domestic travel was related to his pastoral duties, he was not entitled to reimbursement under that plan. Petitioners
have failed to substantiate or otherwise prove their entitlement to deduct any amount for Pastor Burden’s 2013 domestic traveling expenses.

The IRS concluded that his traveling expenses were personal and not deductible for Federal income tax purposes. See sec. 262(a); sec. 1.162-2(b)(1),
Income Tax Regs. The IRS disallowed petitioners a deduction for travel expenses of $10,897.

D. Miscellaneous Business Expenses Not Including Meals and
Entertainment

Office furniture is a capital asset, and, barring an election under section 179, petitioners were not entitled to deduct for 2013 the full cost of the furniture. See secs. 167(a), 263(a)(1)(G); Ellis Banking Corp. v. Commissioner, 688 F.2d 1376, 1379 (11th Cir. 1982).  Petitioners offer nothing to satisfy a listed property’s substantiation requirements by showing business purpose and business use for the two computers. The IRS allows petitioners no deduction for the cost of either computer.
Since petitioners have not shown that they meet the requirements of sec. 280A(c)(1) for the deduction of home office expenses, the exception outlined in sec.
280F(d)(4)(B) is inapplicable here. As with his cell phone expense, the IRS allowed petitioners no deduction for internet expenses. See Venuto v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2017-123, at *17. Petitioners have not produced any receipts or bills that would substantiate
their deduction of $100 for ink or paper.  The IRS allowed petitioners no deduction
for ink or paper.

E. Meals and Entertainment Expenses

Petitioners have provided credit card records that show expenditures during 2013 at what appear to be restaurants. That is insufficient. To be allowed to receive a deduction for expenditure for a meal, a taxpayer must, by adequate records or by sufficient evidence corroborating the taxpayer’s own statements, show the time and place of the meal and the business purpose. Sec. 274(d); sec. 1.274- 5(c)(2)(iii), Income Tax Regs.; sec. 1.274-5T(b)(3), (c) Petitioners’ credit card records
do not explain the business purpose of the meals charged or how the expenditures relate to Pastor Burden’s employment.

The IRS allowed petitioners no deduction for meals or entertainment.

F. Union Dues and Professional Association Dues

Petitioners failed to provide any testimony, records, or other evidence sufficient to substantiate that they paid any union dues and professional association dues during 2013. The IRS allowed petitioners no deduction for such dues.

G. Crash Pad

The taxpayer’s additional living and traveling expenses result from personal choice and are not ordinary and necessary business expenses. Tucker v. Commissioner,
55 T.C. 783, 786 (1971). The IRS did not allow petitioners a deduction for any crash pad expenses incurred in 2013.

H. Special Shoes

Because petitioners have failed to offer any evidence of the business need for the shoes or that any amount was paid for shoes in 2013, the IRS allowed no deduction for the $619 claimed spent for special shoes.

I. Tax Preparation Fees

Petitioners are entitled to deduct tax preparation fees of $200 under section 212(3).

J. Accuracy-Related Penalty

The taxpayer may be subject to an accuracy-related penalty for an underpayment attributable to, among other things,
negligence or disregard of rules or regulations or a substantial understatement of
income tax.

Reference: https://www.ustaxcourt.gov/UstcInOp2/OpinionViewer.aspx?ID=11982

Business Meals with Spouses

In court case Fitch v Commr., the IRS didn’t allow business deduction of meals with a spouse because the petitioners have not met their burden of proving that the spousal meals are ordinary and necessary business expenses.

Limited descriptions of why spousal meals are necessary are not sufficient enough to substantiate a business purpose.

Also, the taxpayers were responsible for an accuracy-related penalty.

Reference: https://taxpayeradvocate.irs.gov/2013-Annual-Report/downloads/Most-Litigated-Issues.pdf

Also see John D. MOSS, Jr. and Diane C. Moss v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

When the IRS sends out CP2000 letters, they explain what the taxpayer needs to do to resolve the issue.

CP2000 proposes a tax due, and the taxpayer either agrees or disagrees with the proposed tax liability. The taxpayer needs to respond within 30 days. If the taxpayer doesn’t respond within 30 days or if the IRS can’t accept what the taxpayer included as additional information, the IRS will send CP3219A Statutory Notice of Deficiency. This notice will also provide detailed steps of what steps the taxpayer needs to take to resolve it.

It may take months or even years after you file your tax return before receiving the notice. Don’t think that once you filed everything and the IRS issued you a refund- they had no problem with what you entered in your tax return. The IRS doesn’t work as fast as you think. Although, their machines still work and match taxpayers’ income to find errors.

What can we do to help taxpayers avoid receiving painful CP2000 letters?

VirtTax Inc. has a program to prevent CP2000 letters. VirtTax Inc. can monitor taxpayers’ transcripts and timely tell the taxpayer if there is a problem with their tax return. If that’s the case, the problem can be timely addressed, which prevents CP2000 and, in some cases, even an audit. You can subscribe to this program here: https://tax-bookkeeping-payroll-limited-liability-company.square.site/product/taxreturnmonitoring/9?cp=true&sbp=false

poker school of negotiation new casino in sioux falls sd casino around dayton ohio diamond casino gold glitch 2.0 bonus aniversar casino superbet jobs macau casino claw slot machine

No Comments

Leave a Comment

Skip to content